Making the Most of MultiCloud

Experts make a clear distinction between hybrid and multicloud environments. The General Services Administration’s MultiCloud and Hybrid Cloud Guide notes that a multicloud architecture reflects the deliberate integration of services from multiple cloud service providers. By contrast, a hybrid architecture integrates public cloud, private cloud and on-premises infrastructure.

In a recent pulse survey of FCW readers, 49% of respondents said their agencies rely on hybrid cloud environments that combine public and private clouds with on-premises systems, and 39% said their cloud environments were based on private clouds. Only 8% identified themselves as multicloud. Multicloud environments are the natural evolution of the government’s move to the cloud. As technologies become more targeted and sophisticated, it is clear that a single product cannot meet all agency needs. Multicloud represents a highly individualized, fluid approach to capitalizing on everything cloud has to offer. Regardless of where they are on their journeys, agencies continue to benefit from advances in cloud technology. That’s because the same spirit of innovation that gave rise to the cloud is giving rise to new solutions for securing and managing cloud environments. Learn how your agency can determine an optimal cloud strategy in Carahsoft’s Innovation in Government® report.

 

How the Mission Drives MultiCloud Success

IIG FCW MultiCloud JanFeb Blog Embedded Image 2023“For government agencies, security is a key consideration when adopting cloud technologies. The latest solutions can actually help agencies improve their security posture because of the specialized and deep focus that cloud providers bring to their mission of providing scalable and secure compute, network and storage infrastructure. At Google, we take a defense-in-depth approach to security and have over 1,000 professionals whose sole job is to ensure the security of our customers’ data and systems. They have made it their mission to prevent bad actors — whether people, companies or nation-states — from accessing customers’ data.”

Read more insights from Scott Frohman, Head of Defense Programs at Google Cloud.

 

Choosing the Right Cloud Tool for the Job  

“Adding multicloud environments into an agency’s IT portfolio does come with challenges. In particular, it can create complexity for security teams that must protect the agency’s identities, devices, data, applications and infrastructure. Traditional cybersecurity tools weren’t designed for multicloud environments, and it can be difficult to transition from existing tools to platform-specific and cloud-native ones, but doing so is essential for taking full advantage of cloud’s market-leading security capabilities.”

Read more insights from Jason Payne, CTO at Microsoft Federal.

 

Seamlessly Embracing a MultiCloud Environment

“Choosing the right cloud solutions can be a daunting task, but knowing what steps to take can significantly streamline the process. Agencies should begin by clearly identifying their business and functional requirements and considering their security needs. Doing so will make it possible to evaluate which cloud service provider (CSP) is positioned to offer the best capabilities for the best cost. Throughout the process, agencies should keep in mind that enterprise data is their single most important asset.”

Read more insights from James Donlon, Director of Solution Engineering for Government and Education at Oracle.

 

The Move to MultiCloud by Default  

“Automation is essential for multicloud management. Agencies can begin by automating activities and sharpening their skills in their own data centers. Once government IT professionals work with a platform to automate activities in the data center, they can then automate deployments to various clouds and make the process as efficient as possible. When automation is done correctly, agencies also give themselves the ability to move workloads smoothly between environments, whether they want to bring a workload back into the data center or move it to another cloud. The fact that the workload was built on an automation platform means agencies are already a step ahead when it comes to getting that deployment done and reaping the benefits of a multicloud environment.”

Read more insights from Adam Clater, Chief Architect of the North America Public Sector at Red Hat.

 

A Smarter Approach to Cloud Adoption

“The cloud-smart strategy is to migrate then modernize most workloads because the speed of cloud adoption and the consolidation of operating constructs is crucial. Such an approach also reduces costs, migration manpower and training burdens. In fact, most workloads can move to the optimized cloud of choice as-is if the right abstraction and workload management capabilities are employed. Once applications are in the cloud, they are easier to modernize.”

Read more insights from Jeremiah Sanders, Senior Transformation Strategist at VMware.

 

Download the full Innovation in Government® report for more insights from these cloud thought leaders and additional industry research from FCW.

DoDIIS Takeaways: Future DoD and IC Initiatives for AI, ML and the Cloud

This blog series focuses on the Department of Defense (DoD) and Intelligence Community (IC) initiatives for 2023 and beyond. Part one covered future plans regarding IT workforce development and retention, partnerships, interoperability and data management. Part Two continues the discussion of the intertwining initiatives and technologies in AI, ML and cloud computing to provide a more complete picture of the current DoD and IC landscape in connection with their vision for the future.

While data is the lifeblood for the digital transformation, artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are what make digesting the information possible. Cloud allows for this data to be hyperscaled, more agile and more efficient for operations. All of these elements and technologies work together to propel the DoD and IC to the next level and achieve mission goals.

Carahsoft DoDIIS AI ML and Cloud Part 2 Blog Embedded Image 2023AI and ML

To properly understand AI and ML’s role in the future of the DoD and IC, some standard definitions must be established. While the private sector mostly utilizes AI for emergency response, healthcare, finance, agriculture and human resources, the military’s most common uses include cyber defense, swarming, vulnerability scanning and data filtration. This creates a stark difference in understanding and terms. For the purposes of this blog, the terms AI and ML will reflect the terms used during the live DoDIIS speeches and discussions.

With AI and ML, one of the biggest hurdles for the IC is explainability. Before new data can be incorporated from other sources, existing data must be processed. CTOs and Directors of the CIA, DIA, National Media Exploitation Center (NMEC) and Virtualitics explained that if current data holdings are not sorted and understood during the data cataloging processes, it will be difficult to utilize AI and understand the results later. Data governance and data strategy are foundational to this effort. All parties involved also need to understand the ethical implications of AI and have a strong grasp of data analysis and machine learning to harness all of these technologies’ true powers. Other safeguards must be put in place to properly introduce the use of AI and ML within their intended contexts. AI testing and evaluation (T&E) is different than for other tech, since AI capabilities should not be set and left without monitoring and a way to update a model in the field. Instead, the models should continue to be supervised over time by system creators and end users across academia, industry and government to preserve accuracy and high precision. The baseline within the hierarchy of needs is ensuring quality data results, which requires clear understanding of the algorithmic approaches being employed for the models. Vendor technology that provides clear AI explainability is particularly sought after in the DoD and IC since it can be used to back tactical life or death decisions. One solution the DoD is pursuing to address this challenge is the machine-as-a-teammate (MaaT) capability which automates data transformation to significantly increase velocity and precision while remaining explainable.

The DoD has begun focusing heavily on ethical AI frameworks including starting toolkits to assess pipeline or model bias and building a Responsible AI (RAI) foundation to ensure responsible, equitable, traceable, reliable and governed use of data. The DoD hopes industry will continue to adopt RAI principles ahead of future requirements and expand on practical ways to attain these best practices. In addition, the DoD established an AI Council to discuss aligning their RAI framework with AI regulations in other European countries as they seek to integrate systems and open the door for efficient data sharing.

Through initializing use of AI and ML, the DoD and IC have already discovered several benefits. AI has offered enhanced workflows and reduced burden on analysts, advanced filtering techniques on large data sets, open-source scanning for improved product reports and optimized data rates for information transfer. DoD ML pilots achieved 100x increase in quality review and 10x increase in pre-decision error/anomaly detection, among other successes. DoD and IC leaders look to AI as gateway to better identify vulnerabilities in military systems, improve the identification of targets or locations and increase accuracy and speed of retrieving battle damage assessments. While the technology exists to perform these tasks, the policies and permissions are not yet complete to fully implement AI and ML.

Handling the massive quantities of data is a huge undertaking; however, processing the information through AI and ML has proven the worth of the endeavor tenfold and delivered clear mission impact. By focusing on the infrastructure first, the DoD and IC can leverage AI and ML for maximum impact to let machines and humans each do what they do best and then team up to solve the problems in between.

While there are some risks to implementing AI completely such as data set accuracy, vulnerabilities to adversarial influence, legal ramifications and expectations of data use tech, DoD and IC officials confidently endorse the transition to incorporating more AI. They recommend several key steps such as creating a common international policy that addresses ethical concerns, technological advancement and dual use; defining AI for policy given the dynamic and changing nature of technology; and identifying definitions and strategies around non-lethal options, hardening systems and mission enhancement. The DIA’s AI strategy aims to achieve AI readiness in the near term, AI competitiveness in the mid-term and AI dominance in the long-term.

The Cloud

According to Dr. Raj G. Iyer, former CIO for Information Technology Reform, Office of the Secretary of the Army, cloud is an absolute necessity to move large amounts of data across the globe. The concept of data-centricity shifting within the Army from theory to doctrine, has precipitated other essential changes including the migration to cloud. Dr. Iyer stated that the new data goals are no longer owned by just “tech folks”, but by every warfighter, which places a new level of priority on technology like cloud. The new Army initiative includes achieving a distributed command and control (C2) structure for the Army to provide more mobility and less centralization both with C2 and the data. This will be attained through the adoption of its Hybrid Cloud of the Future to hide data “in plain sight” and avoid systems that are uniquely military in nature. When the military leverages a commercial platform, it can process data in a way where adversaries cannot differentiate sensitive information from other commercial processes.

Across the rest of the DoD and IC, agencies vary in their level of cloud migration. For the NGA, business applications and analytics are already in the cloud, the next step is to move to a hybrid multicloud with resources that need to be on hardware available at Joint Regional Edge Nodes. The NSA hopes to avoid a lift-and-shift approach, and instead be precise with their cloud investments through initiatives such as Hybrid Cloud Compute, Eagle Crossing, and a Human Capital Management System. DISA has brought cloud programs together for the DoD under their Host and Compute Center (HACC) through the Joint Warfighting Cloud Capability (JWCC) contract.

For agencies which have not migrated, the DoD and IC recommend preparing for cloud deployment and utilizing this time before switching to cloud to eliminate bad practices that exist on-prem and focus on relevance, resourcing and complete system readiness. As other technologies and strategies take effect, DoD and IC officials reminded of the importance of prioritizing cloud first, cloud native and Zero Trust baked in throughout every aspect regardless of cloud migration stage.

Some challenges DoD and IC officials presented to industry were how to maintain service if an outage occurs in regional data centers from a classified perspective and how to maintain and optimize the network from a unified comm perspective considering its sensitivity to latency. Overall, leaders inquired how to preserve reliability and redundancy to overcome potential distrust of the cloud. As the DoD and IC collaborate with industry to innovate and resolve these issues, it continues to unlock new doors of potential. Dr. Iyer stated that the network is no longer an enabling function, and these digital technologies are now changing how the DoD and IC fundamentally view warfighting.

As the DoD and IC seek to accomplish these IT goals and prepare the way for future modernization, industry, academia and other government agencies must come together to solve current challenges, innovate new solutions and support mission initiatives. Government leaders noted the importance of these modernization efforts and that the technologies and strategies developed in the next 5-10 years will be the foundation of operations for the next generation.

 

Check out our Fast Facts and Future Initiatives of the DoD and IC Resource for more information and key insights for the IT industry.

*The information contained in this blog has been written based off the thought-leadership discussions presented by speakers at DoDIIS 2022.*

DoDIIS Takeaways: IT Workforce, Partnerships, Interoperability and Data Management

As the defense and intelligence communities reflect on 2022 and plan for the future, several key takeaways will guide upcoming initiatives. At the Department of Defense Intelligence Information System (DoDIIS) Worldwide, a conference sponsored by the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), attendees from the military, industry, government and academia gathered to collaborate and share insights on accomplishing the Department of Defense’s mission.

Agency leaders highlighted that every aspect of the Department of Defense (DoD) and Intelligence Community (IC) is critically enabled by IT. Not only is IT the first-in and last-out function for every crisis, oftentimes IT is the mission, not just a supporting role. The DIA recognizes that to innovate with current technology and invest in emerging tech, the journey to maximum productivity often includes the critical evaluation of processes and programs. With IT, misuses must be corrected, software needs to be transparent to users and technology simplified to promote a seamless integration. In essence, IT should be viewed as an evolution instead of a revolution.

To accomplish these goals, the DIA laid out its five main areas of prioritization for the coming years:

  • IT workforce retention
  • JWICS modernization, resilience and autonomy
  • DoDIIS modernization
  • International connectivity and partnerships
  • Capability delivery pipeline with Zero Trust and data management

The first part of this two-part blog series covers the discussions of DoD and IC challenges in relation to IT workforce development and retention, partnerships and interoperability and data management. The second blog will cover the enabling technology being deployed including artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning (ML) and the cloud.

Carahsoft DoDIIS Recap Blog Embedded Image 2023IT Workforce Development and Retention

The DoD and IC have encountered challenges upskilling the workforce and uncovering new talent. To fill the gap in applicants, the DIA and IC have turned to contract hires and those from industry who want to spend only a few years in government. The DIA also offers an Education With Industry (EWI) Program where DIA employees can get joint duty credit while working with an industry partner. In addition, the DIA and National Geospatial Intelligence Agency (NGA) have developed recruiting programs for high schoolers and partnerships with local universities to offer high school internships in hopes of encouraging students to develop interest in a government career.

High competition for talent has increased the need for retention incentives and additional education so agencies can maintain the current workforce. To address these concerns, the DoD and IC have begun modernizing their HR systems and seek to automate HR processes and provide self-service capabilities in hopes of expediting the talent acquisition timeline. Another endeavor includes modernizing training platforms for current employees to keep their skillsets up to date. Investing in continuing-education for these agency subject matter experts is important since they play an essential role in advising commanders and building tech options to address threats. Leadership is looking to academia and industry to source individuals with understanding of the current DoD and IC challenges and the global crises. By pulling from these outlets, the DoD and IC can expedite the process rather than having to train from the ground up with high school recruits. To successfully integrate industry workers into the government sphere, the DoD and IC must adapt to make commercial approaches work as well.

Partnerships and Interoperability

In the realm of defense and intelligence, partnerships and interoperability of technology are key to achieving results that maximize each agencies’ unique capabilities and pool combined strengths. By engaging with other agencies and countries, commanders have access to additional information and options. Investing in these resources offer some resolutions to the DoD’s current challenge of how to rapidly develop new warfighting capabilities while also simultaneously addressing current threats.

These partnerships can make a difference through data sharing, which offers new knowledge to commanders for more informed decision making. To make this information and technology sharing a reality, systems and processes must ensure cross-domain security and allow for interoperability throughout data sourcing countries and agencies. Partnering more significantly with Five Eyes countries (FVEY), will be a major source of increased intelligence as the DIA shifts towards integrating systems. In the near future, any DIA cybersecurity programs that do not align and add value to the FVEY countries will be either adapted or removed.

DoD and IC leaders also hope to collaborate with allies such as the Five Eyes to establish baseline international policies that will open doors for easier parity of information and comparability of systems and technology. Without a universal frame of reference, definitions, and laws, practical progress and innovation is impeded.

Connecting with industry has proven to be another valuable resource as DoD and IC leaders are seeking to better understand the full capabilities of current and emerging technology and gain insight into how industry can solve mission challenges. The DoD and IC desire to foster a culture that values systematic, strategic and equitable private sector engagement as well as addresses barriers to those relationships.

Involving the community through continued conversations and strong alliances provides an integrated deterrent and an advantage over the adversary. While these partnerships have taken a back seat in the past, DoD and IC leaders believe that this needs to be a crucial change and take priority.

Data Management

One of the main cruxes for the DoD and IC is harnessing the power of data. Since everything begins with data, the DoD and IC recognize the responsibility to think and act strategically from data collection to exploitation, dissemination and disposal, and seek to improve current data handling methods. Dr. Stacey A. Dixon, Principal Deputy Director of National Intelligence, believes that developing strategies in the IC to accelerate delivery of that data to those that need it, is the greatest challenge of our time for defense and the IC. Currently the DoD has crossed the limit of data input, overwhelming existing data strategies and making data too siloed, too slow and too hard to find to successfully stay ahead of threats. As the volume of data increases, several measures must be put in place to leverage the wealth of information.

According to DoD and IC officials, the one thing industry and government agencies alike can collectively improve, is interoperability; however, unless data source countries’ systems are secure and the data can be worked together, this cannot be accomplished. Because a large, diverse set of data is needed for good ethics and proper execution, the DoD and IC look to gain increased ability to integrate data across classification levels. Maintaining Zero Trust and consistent monitoring is also critical to freeing the data from other sources.

Over the coming years, the DoD and IC seek to implement widespread data tagging as a foundation for effective data management and quality results. This will allow the combining of commercial and government data to merge with the context and experience that the DoD and IC possess to achieve well rounded, sound decisions.

The Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) released its IC Data Strategy 2023-2025, which outlines its plans for improving the management and use of data. The strategy aims to leverage data to operate, collaborate and communicate at any time, in any place and in any security domain at speed, scale and securely. To achieve this transformation, the strategy focuses on four areas: performing end-to-end data management, delivering data interoperability and analytics at speed and scale, seeking advanced partnerships for continued digital and data innovation, and transforming the IC into a data-driven enterprise. Finally, it outlines a modular and agile framework that integrates business, functional, technical, security and data standards to provide a blueprint for the use of data in the IC.

Dr. Raj G. Iyer, former CIO for Information Technology Reform, Office of the Secretary of the Army, stated that data will be the new ammunition. At the end of the day, it comes down to enabling optionality for commanders, enabling mission command and enabling a common operating picture. Dr. Iyer emphasized that this is not a technology strategy, but a digital transformation to change operating models and leverage data in ways that U.S. competitors have not.

Utilizing artificial intelligence, machine learning and the cloud will empower these goals. Read part two of this series to find out more.

 

Check out our Fast Facts and Future Initiatives of the DoD and IC Resource for more information and key insights for the IT industry.

*The information contained in this blog has been written based off the thought-leadership discussions presented by speakers at DoDIIS 2022.*

The Pros and Cons of Low-code in Cybersecurity Environments

In the past, new technology solutions required highly experienced developers to compile certain coding languages, understand specific technologies and utilize specialized software. On top of these challenges, traditional development platforms limited innovation. Now, organizations have a new and improved development option, which can reduce time and costs while increasing customizability, automation and growth, known as low-code platforms.

Low-code can be implemented in various ways, but in the cybersecurity realm, it is often used to automate and streamline processes, such as cybersecurity operations. Low-code platforms allow digital teams to access capabilities and customizable technologies and tools that empower them to quickly produce valuable innovations, applications, and solutions with little to no limitations. Gartner predicts that 70% of new applications will use low-code or no-code technologies by 2025. As a result, application development will shift to allow teams to focus more on assembly and integration rather than development, resulting in improved efficiency, enhanced employee satisfaction and increased productivity.

For the Department of Defense (DoD) cybersecurity professionals, low-code presents an array of benefits and challenges. While it creates agility, simplification and innovation, low-code can also introduce cybersecurity risks and vulnerabilities.

Challenges of Low-Code in DoD Environments

When implementing any new process or platform, the DoD must pay attention to overall security and identify any potential risk factors that could infiltrate the environment. The DoD faces a unique challenge when considering low-code: supply chain management and ensuring the secure execution of low-code to avoid presenting new threats to its organization. For example, borrowing and leveraging unverified code from the internet can cause significant problems among an organization’s platforms. Copying and pasting code without testing it can lead to bugs, errors and inaccuracies that can slow down and harm an environment, creating further security issues.

Tychon Low-Code Cybersecurity Blog Embedded Image 2023For cybersecurity and zero trust professionals within the industry, this idea of obtaining and launching bad content is particularly challenging as they strive to protect their organization’s operations. These groups must also be prepared to identify insider threat and guarantee security when utilizing a truly limitless customization of content like low-code. Organizations must ensure new code is protected yet unrestricted. Otherwise, they run the risk of negating the purpose of a low-code platform. Ultimately, the sources and employees creating and executing new low-code must be trusted entities to avoid problems like data leaks, exploitation and cyber-attacks.

Benefits of Low-Code in Cybersecurity

While there are clear risks, the benefits to using low-code solutions continue to make it a desirable cybersecurity option. It offers the flexibility to stay ahead of emerging threats, while simultaneously saving on costs. Ultimately, low-code development enables organizations to keep pace with an ever-changing security landscape.

  • Respond immediately to emerging threats: Local platforms help an organization to become more agile. Customized low-code content enables organizations to respond quickly when existing security tools may not be able to support the software system and prevent or stop a threat.
  • Quickly create custom features: The flexibility of low-code within local platforms allows for the creation of features to match the immediate needs of an organization instead of waiting for the release of the latest software which may or may not solve the problem. The progression of low-code implementation increases the longevity and growth of an organization.
  • Build upon low-code and local platforms to save on costs: A low-code solution along with the implementation of a local platform should be able to fulfill multiple use cases and eliminate various other tools from an organization’s toolbox. Once a local platform is implemented, limitations can be lifted and advancements or replacements can be made to older legacy systems instead of purchasing multiple new tools. This saves costs for security and asset management teams.

Eliminating Risk in Low-Code Capabilities in Cybersecurity Today

The good news for cybersecurity organizations is that they can easily mitigate low-code risks and challenges with proper access controls and a simple deployment process. Any new code created for government customers or internal purposes should undergo rigorous and reliable testing through multiple levels of technical experts within an organization to ensure quality, validity and trustworthiness. Additionally, testing in a simulation of the customer’s intended environment for that code should only be a matter of minutes, ensuring a smooth production process once the code has been executed.

If purchasing a low-code solution from a third-party vendor, organizations should investigate their internal code reviews, Quality Assurance testing and delivery methods to ensure strict standards are being met. Features such as signed content, restricted third party binary executions, and more help ensure an organization can take advantage of the numerous benefits of a low-code platform without introducing risk and vulnerabilities.

The Future of Low-Code

Today’s advanced artificial intelligence-driven technology, combined with natural language processing, enables everyday employees to create complex code by simply asking a question. The local community base within organizations now has the power to heighten efficiency, productivity and creation for their deployments with quicker, more customized low-code content. Low-code and local platform capabilities provide the freedom to create innovative solutions facilitating the growth of their business.

 

Learn more about secure, low-code cybersecurity solutions like TYCHON at tychon.io.

How to get StateRAMP Ready Faster with Security Snapshot

Security is of utmost importance to government agencies because they have access to the sensitive information of millions of people. To ensure this information stays private, StateRAMP (State Risk and Authorization Management Program) offers several guidelines to help.

StateRAMP is a nonprofit launched in 2021 and modeled after FedRAMP, a government-wide program that promotes secure cloud usage across the Federal government. State and local governments created StateRAMP to extend this authorization to the relationships between cloud service providers (CSPs) and state and local governments to improve cybersecurity posture. As an independent  nonprofit organization, StateRAMP has created a process for continuous cybersecurity improvement to efficiently and cost-effectively verify the cybersecurity of cloud service providers.

Carahsoft StateRAMP Security Snapshot Blog Embedded Image 2023A main initiative is evaluating the data security capabilities of cloud solution providers that sell to state and local governments. StateRAMP ensures CSPs meet minimum security requirements and helps them obtain verification and achieve certification. These verification statuses were created by StateRAMP and must be certified by a third party. To simplify this certification process, StateRAMP has introduced “Security Snapshot.”

Hurdles to Attaining StateRAMP Verification

StateRAMP has had an Authorized Product List since 2021,updated at the end of every business day. This list is comprised of verified providers who meet the minimum security requirements and provide an independent audit conducted by a Third Party Assessment Organization (3PAO). StateRAMP recognizes three verified statuses:

  1. Ready: The product meets minimum requirements.
  2. Provisional: The product exceeds minimum requirements and has a government sponsor.
  3. Authorized: The product satisfies all requirements and has a government sponsor.

There are 38 cloud service offerings (CSOs), 4 local government agencies, 2 universities and 17 states that are qualified in the above three tiers.

A Simpler Future with Security Snapshot

After StateRAMP’s verification process was introduced, providers encountered several questions. For some CSPs, it wasn’t easy to know if they could achieve a StateRAMP-Ready approval. The fear that CSPs would be left with a public, poor StateRAMP score induced anxiety in starting the approval process. Many agencies were unsure if they were making progress in the right direction. To combat this, StateRAMP released a new solution in early January 2023—the “Security Snapshot.”

Security Snapshot provides detailed information on how companies can get StateRAMP-certified. The snapshot offers a preliminary numerical score that CSPs can share with prospective government clients, which will not appear on the CSP’s record.

This resource acts as an early-stage security maturity assessment tool for cloud products. The intent of the service is to provide a first step toward achieving StateRAMP security status. The criteria are designed to help agencies validate minimum requirements and provide controls and additional benchmarks that would further aid in certification.

The Security Snapshot also helps providers gain quality insight into security postures and third-party cloud solutions such as Software as a Service (SaaS), Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) and Platform as a Service (PaaS) products. Ultimately, it provides insights for providers and the government branches they serve.

With the introduction of Security Snapshot, CSPs can ease their concerns, knowing they will receive detailed, personalized support to help them qualify for StateRAMP’s verification.

 

For more information on StateRAMP’s security approach, visit our StateRAMP resource hub and watch our Carahsoft briefing at carah.io/StateRAMP.

AvePoint Adds Governance, Management, Data Protection and Migration Support for Microsoft Power Platform

Carahsoft partner AvePoint Public Sector recently announced its support for the governance, management, migration and data protection of Microsoft Power Platform environments. As more organizations adopt Power Platform to automate processes, build digital solutions, analyze data and create virtual agents, IT leaders need strategies that support their unique governance, security and compliance requirements.

AvePoint’s support for Power Platform helps organizations:

  • Provide scalable management and governance: Access management and risk assessments allow organizations to quickly drive impactful collaboration and sustainable Power Platform adoption. Best practices and productivity can be achieved through automated governance and policies, enforcing proper control of data access and functionality.
  • Protect critical workspaces, apps and flows: AvePoint’s automated backup for Power BI workspaces, Power Apps and flows makes it seamless to avoid accidental data deletion, user error or ransomware. This way, organizations can ensure they’re protected, compliant and prepared for business continuity when using Power Platform.
  • Seamlessly migrate data: Building on AvePoint’s award-winning migration capabilities, organizations can now migrate apps from an environment within the same tenant or between tenants – giving organizations more opportunities to successfully use Power Platform.
AvePoint and Microsoft Integration Blog Embedded Image 2023

Some organizations are already taking advantage of the AvePoint’s Power Platform support. “AvePoint’s support for Power Platform has helped us empower employees to safely build solutions that will enhance their work,” Mike Fettner, Principal Office 365 Engineering at Regeneron, said. “As an organization, this allows us to continue taking smart risks because we know robust governance solutions will put the right guardrails in place, and data protection will ensure none of our data or workflows are lost.”

Register today to join AvePoint and Microsoft for Power Platform Workshop: A Framework to Manage and Govern Power Platform at Scale, coming to a city near you later this Spring.

Connecting Customers with AvePoint and Industry Solutions

It has never been easier to count on Carahsoft and AvePoint. We can help your agency with:

  • Quick quote turnaround and smart spending
  • Industry-expert cloud computing product recommendations
  • 24/7 live assistance to get you up and running faster

Contact a member of the Carahsoft and AvePoint Public Sector team today and discover how we can support your organization.

How CISOs Can Come to Grips With a New Priority – Securing the Supply Chain

Software supply chain hacks are now the most prevalent form of cyberattack. According to the latest Verizon Data Breach Investigations Report, 62% of system intrusion incidents came through a third-party, highlighting the difficulties that many organizations – including federal agencies – face in securing their supply chain. A recent flurry of legislative activity demands that CISOs step-up their supply chain due diligence – and fast.

Key among these directives and guidance is the Enduring Security Framework (ESF). Developed by NSA, ODNI, and CISA, and modeled on the NIST Secure Software Development Framework (SSDF), ESF aims to harmonize previously disparate Cyber Supply Chain Risk Management (C-SCRM) policies and procedures across the federal government. A key tenet of ESF – and also a requirement of a new White House Memo (M-22-18) – is vendor self-attestation to software developed in accordance with NIST standards.

Yet, despite directives from the highest levels of government, questions remain:

  • Does every ESF recommendation and control have to be met by software vendors?
  • Are some C-SCRM practices and standards a priority over others?
  • Will OMB require point-in-time or continual attestation?
  • When will the standardized self-attestation form be released?

Until we have answers, one thing is clear – software supply chain security can’t be solved by directives and guidelines alone. The reality is, a threat can only truly be mitigated through increased cooperation between the public and private sectors. As head of government affairs at SolarWinds here’s my take on how the agencies and industry can join forces to collaborate.

Cooperation Must Occur – CISO to CISO

SolarWinds Securing the Supply Chain Blog Embedded Image 2023

Typically, software purchases are one-time transactional exchanges. After all, the goal is to make procurement, installation, and deployment as quick and efficient as possible. In this model, relationships between the software vendor or supplier and the procuring agency aren’t nurtured. It’s an approach I believe needs to change.

To protect our shared infrastructure from evolving threats, federal security leaders must build lasting and meaningful relationships with software vendors.

Creating these partnerships is the future of C-SCRM in the federal government. Indeed, following the 2020 SUNBURST hack, we set out on a mission to lead the way to safer IT with our Secure by Design initiative. This effort included launching a new model for secure software development to strengthen the integrity of build environments.

Crucially, we also committed to establishing new standards in information-sharing and public-private partnerships. Government security leaders should communicate frequently and continuously with their industry counterparts about enterprise software security, the development process, and adherence to ESF standards. When it comes to their vendors, Federal CISOs must also have a dedicated person to call at any time – not just a toll-free number.

Screen Vendors in Seven Steps

Self-attestation may be mandated, but it won’t fix everything. After all, most agencies lack the resources to evaluate every software vendor’s self-declaration, opening the doors to abuse. The compliance framework may also seriously hinder the procurement process.

Until OMB issues further guidance, agencies can screen their suppliers’ security measures using a set of seven questions developed by our CISO, Tim Brown, and DHS CISO Ken Bible in the aftermath of the SUNBURST. Those questions are:

  • How do your vendors secure software code?
  • What type of environment do you build your software in?
  • Have they established secure software development framework roles and responsibilities?
  • Are they using automation and DevSecOps to automate developer and security toolchains?
  • What policies and measures do they have in place to prevent malicious or vulnerable software from affecting their customer base?
  • How are they monitoring risk in their own supply chain?
  • If a breach occurs, what’s their process for notifying customers?

Defending Together

Security is an ongoing journey with no finish line, but federal agencies and their vendor ecosystem can become smarter and more cyber resilient if they are transparent, collaborate, and learn from previous attacks.

Download our Whitepaper to learn more about how this model can be used to secure the software supply chain, or to learn more about SolarWinds Secure by Design initiative, SolarWinds’ recently launched Next-Generation Build System, a model for secure enterprise software development.

Ransomware Security Strategies

One of the first challenges in combatting ransomware is recognizing the imminence of an attack and the impact it could have on an individual’s personal organization. For 60% of companies surveyed by ActualTech Media and Ransomeware.org, they reported spending zero to four hours on ransomware preparedness per month.[1] Getting collective buy-in from administrators can be difficult since the cybersecurity measures put into place cannot show their full value without being hit by a ransomware attack; however, when compared to the number and scale of attacks occurring, greater attention to cybersecurity is imperative. The NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) provides a guiding set of principles that inform strategies for mitigating ransomware risk. Addressing ransomware starts with identification of a security program followed by protection, prevention, detection, recovery and then security improvements. Ideally companies would follow this CSF outline but in reality, for most organizations the path looks different. Due to feasibility and order of highest critical priority, many companies first establish detection and recovery methods followed by protection, prevention, and security improvement.

RANSOMWARE DETECTION AND RECOVERY

When ransomware hits an organization, the biggest immediate concern is finding the problem and returning to business operations as usual. Many resources exist to assist with this endeavor including asset management tools that automatically inventory all devices on the network and monitor for potential ways malware can get in. Implementing edge detection allows companies to be alerted and quickly identify early on if the network has been compromised and which accounts and devices require isolation and additional measures to prevent the further spread to other servers, accounts and storage units. Anti-virus programs are also helpful to monitor endpoints for indicators of compromise or malware. By achieving early detection, companies can contain the malware and reduce data loss.[2] It also aids in preventing extended downtime which is very costly for operations and business reputation. Apart from the actual ransom, the downtime alone caused by cyberattacks in 2020 cost $20.9 billion to American businesses.[1]

Once malware has been detected, a company’s recovery plan and preparation are put to the test. IT specialists and company administrators need to have an emergency plan in place so there are straightforward steps to recovery. Backups not only need to be created and stored off-site, but also updated on a regular basis and tested to ensure that they are a solid base for a system restoration. With most traditional backup systems, the data cannot be recovered fast enough to neutralize the ransomware’s impact on operations. Instead, a new strategy must be adopted that shifts from 200,000 files taking eight plus hours to restore via the traditional backups, to millions of files being recovered in minutes. Granular, immutable, verifiable snapshots are required to successfully recover all of an organization’s data.[2]

Carahsoft Ransomware Cybersecurity Blog Series Blog 3 Infographic Image 2023

The Sophos “State of Ransomware” report indicated that 77% of healthcare organizations that did not experience a ransomware attack in 2021 attributed it to efforts such as backups and cyber insurance, which help with remediation but not prevention. This exposed an ongoing misunderstanding within the industry on cybersecurity methods.[3] Obtaining cyber-insurance does not prevent future attacks; however, instituting proper security strategies does decrease the susceptibility to ransomware. Recovery tools and insurance provide support during post-breach response but ultimately, in conjunction, organizations should strive to prevent the attack in the first place which requires implementing protection and prevention. According to the Government Accountability Office (GAO), cyber-insurance is a valuable resource to employ but noted that it is increasingly harder to acquire, due to the massive volume of cyberattacks, a higher bar of entry and more requirements to gain coverage and receive payouts. This leaves organizations who do not have sufficient security or insurance to face the recovery process and expensive remediation costs alone.[4]

RANSOMWARE PROTECTION AND PREVENTION

While most organizations invest in attack detection and recovery strategies, the protection aspect of the NIST CSF is equally important and an essential element to reduce the amount of recovery needed. Protection and prevention of ransomware attacks begins with establishing system routines and measures that make it more difficult for hackers to infiltrate. Through implementing Zero Trust user principles such as Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA), institutions and agencies can protect themselves by verifying the identity of employees. Poor password hygiene is one of the leading gateways to malware infiltration, making thorough employee training and password management software a baseline to reduce risk. The average user has access to over 20 million corporate files, making each employee a critical part of keeping the network safe and a huge liability if they are not vigilant and following best practices.[2] Segmentation of the network to provide user-specific access to data and system resources also creates safety barriers, so in the event of an attack the entire network is not automatically compromised. Around 80% of critical infrastructure companies without Zero Trust policies experience an $1.17 million increase in breach costs bringing to an average of $5.4 million per attack in 2022.[5]

Comprehensive Zero Trust authentication and data access control to limit complete access to the entire company’s files is a first step in this process. File indexing, which classifies the level of sensitivity of information contained, allows companies to better allocate resources to prioritize their protection of the most important or confidential files.[2] When processes are automated through these and other resources, it eases IT teams’ responsibilities and reduces the chance of error. Incorporating artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) also expedites the identification of confidential information with metadata tags, along with advanced detection of suspicious network and user activity, and thereby minimizes inefficiencies.[6]

Organizations must rigorously search for security gaps and proactively work to close them. Some other measures to incorporate include:

  • Filtering for phishing emails and providing awareness training to minimize the possibility of a user accidentally clicking a malicious link
  • Utilizing firewalls to block unusual network traffic and segment the network to impede malware system communications
  • Monitoring software licenses to ensure they are updated and systems are adequately patched
  • Removing expired and extraneous user credentials and unused legacy technology
  • Tracking vulnerabilities on devices like IoTs, OTs, and employees’ personal devices used for work (BYODs) throughout the entire connection lifecycle
  • Implementing Zero Trust cloud security with container scanning and proxies like a Cloud Access Security Broker (CASB) and Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA)

RANSOMWARE SECURITY IMPROVEMENT

Following an attack, companies have the opportunity to grow and improve from the situation as well as share resources with other public and private sector companies to strengthen defenses. Incident reporting is a key strategy to prevent future ransomware incidents and a top priority for the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA). Agencies and organizations must support each other to defend against these cyber threats that affect every industry.[7]

To support this greater focus on information sharing, the Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act of 2022 took effect in March requiring a more stringent timeline and adherence to disclosing cybersecurity attacks and ransomware payments to the government. CISA also now has the authority to subpoena critical infrastructure organizations if they do not report any cybersecurity incidents within 72 hours of a cyberattack and 24 hours of a ransom payment.[8]

This threat information sharing requirement along with other recent rules on reporting attack incidents strengthen organizations’ security posture and reduce the success rates of cyberattacks. Through these joint efforts and public-private partnerships, companies can recover faster, resume normal operations and support other businesses in the defense of their industry and the nation.[9]

To assist with incorporating these cybersecurity best practices, Congress passed the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act Public Law 117–58 which offers $2 billion to “modernize and secure federal, state, and local IT and networks; protect critical infrastructure and utilities; and support public or private entities as they respond to and recover from significant cyberattacks and breaches.”[10]

RANSOMWARE RISK MITIGATION

Tech modernization, while crucial to agencies and organizations’ survival and growth, also presents unique challenges in protecting those technologies.[11] In their journey to securing their legacy and updated systems, companies must take the time to honestly evaluate their cybersecurity standing across the ransomware cycle and ensure their readiness to handle an attack. Utilizing NIST CSF security strategies and other resources help organizations to mitigate risk and empower other companies to learn and protect their systems. By implementing best practices and technologies to address cyber hacks and data breaches, companies are valuing both their customers and their own bottom line. Proactive cybersecurity measures are key for all companies to stem the tide of ransomware attacks and protect the continued growth of their organizations.

 

Learn about the current state of ransomware and its impact across sectors in our Ransomware Series. Visit our website to learn how Carahsoft and its partners are providing solutions to assist in the fight against ransomware.

 

Resources:

[1] “Everything You Need to Know About Ransomware,” Ransomware.org, https://ransomware.org/

[2] “Protect, Detect & Recover: The Three Prongs of a Ransomware Defense Strategy for Your Enterprise Files,” Nasuni, https://media.erepublic.com/document/Whitepaper-_A_Three_Prong_Ransomware_Strategy_-_Nasuni.pdf

[3] “The State of Ransomware in Healthcare 2022,” Sophos, https://news.sophos.com/en-us/2022/06/01/the-state-of-ransomware-in-healthcare-2022/

[4] “Healthcare data breach costs reach record high at $10M per attack: IBM report,” Fierce Healthcare, https://www.fiercehealthcare.com/health-tech/healthcare-data-breach-costs-reach-record-high-10m-attack-ibm-report

[5] “Cyber Attacks Against Critical Infrastructure Quietly Increase,” Government Technology, https://www.govtech.com/blogs/lohrmann-on-cybersecurity/cyber-attacks-against-critical-infrastructure-quietly-increase

[6] “Four Best Practices for Protecting Data Wherever it Exists,” Dell Technologies and Carahsoft, https://www.carahsoft.com/2nd-page/dell-4-best-practices-federal-data-security-protection-report-2022#page=4

[7] “Ransomware Hackers Will Still Target Smaller Critical Infrastructure, CISA Director Warns,” Nextgov, https://www.nextgov.com/cybersecurity/2022/07/ransomware-hackers-will-still-target-smaller-critical-infrastructure-cisa-director-warns/374953/

[8] “DHS Convenes Regulators, Law Enforcement Agencies on Cyber Incident Reporting,” Nextgov, https://www.nextgov.com/cybersecurity/2022/07/dhs-convenes-regulators-law-enforcement-agencies-cyber-incident-reporting/374968/

[9] “Ransomware Attacks on Hospitals Have Changed,” AHA Center for Health Innovation, https://www.aha.org/center/cybersecurity-and-risk-advisory-services/ransomware-attacks-hospitals-have-changed

[10] “FACT SHEET: Top 10 Programs in the Bipartisan Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act That You May Not Have Heard About.” The White House, https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/08/03/fact-sheet-top-10-programs-in-the-bipartisan-infrastructure-investment-and-jobs-act-that-you-may-not-have-heard-about/

[11] “Global Data Protection Index 2021,” Dell Technologies, https://www.dell.com/en-us/dt/data-protection/gdpi/index.htm#pdf-overlay=//www.delltechnologies.com/asset/en-us/products/data-protection/industry-market/global-data-protection-index-key-findings.pdf

Infographic Resources:

“Ransomware and Energy and Utilities,” AT&T Cybersecurity, https://cybersecurity.att.com/blogs/security-essentials/ransomware-and-energy-and-utilities

3 Ways DoD Can Strengthen Network Security and Resilience

In October 2022, CISA (Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency) revealed that multiple hackers had compromised a defense industrial base organization, gaining long-term access to the environment and exfiltrating sensitive data. And those threats are increasing. Since, 2015 the DoD has experienced over 12,000 cyber incidents.

SolarWinds DoD Network Security and Resilience Blog Preview Embedded 2023Strong, resilient next-generation networks that protect sensitive data and DoD missions and functions have never been more critical. But, with a complex interconnected information environment, how can federal IT teams strengthen cybersecurity and become proactive instead of reactive? Army leaders have spent much time discussing resilient next-generation networking, but action needs to be taken soon.

To achieve greater network resilience, here are three steps that federal IT leaders can take to prepare for an unpredictable future and safeguard its networks – and those of its contractors – from malicious cyber activity.

  1. Progress the DoD’s “defend forward” strategy

The DoD’s “defend forward” strategy is nothing new. First outlined in the 2018 DoD Cyber Strategy, the initiative is designed to “disrupt malicious cyber activity at its source.” This refers to any device, network, organization, or adversary nation that poses a threat to U.S. networks and institutions or is actively attacking them.

Notably, the strategy shifts DoD and U.S. Cyber Command’s cybersecurity program from reactive to proactive. Rather than detect and remediate threats as they arise, defend forward actively seeks out threats and eliminates them.

U.S. Cyber Command restated its pledge to “defend forward” in October 2022, but it’s principles and standards must be extended across the defense industrial base – the networks and systems that contribute to U.S. military advantages.

Government contractors are held accountable for their cybersecurity practices and choices, but for true resilience, DoD security leaders must establish new standards for information sharing with their private sector counterparts.

In addition to standing by DoD’s pledge to share indications and warnings of malicious cyber activity, DoD must continue to move beyond transactional vendor relationships. Toll-free numbers are not enough for federal CISOs – they need a dedicated, trusted, point of contact within each defense contractor. Someone with whom they can have frequent and honest conversations, conduct deliberate planning, and oversee collaborative training that enables mutually supporting cyber activities.

  1. Embrace AIOps: The next big thing in networking

Powered by artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning, AIOps is a relatively new approach to network monitoring that boosts resilience by reducing the time it takes to discover issues, detect anomalies, and gives network engineers the context they need to remediate – before a threat materializes.

AIOps-powered observability works by automating the complex task of collecting and analyzing network data across the vast DoD network infrastructure and turning that data into actionable intelligence. With this insight, teams can proactively address network or cyber issues and even predict certain situations – such as signs of network intrusion. A key advantage of AIOps is that it observes remedial action taken and uses these observations to automatically respond to future problems without the need for IT’s involvement – thereby ensuring a more resilient, autonomous network.

  1. Layer in multipath monitoring

Enterprise networks have traditionally been comprised of multiple hub and spoke topologies with linear routing paths and clearly defined traffic flows. But hybrid IT, hyperconverged infrastructure, and modern networking have created complex multipath network environments – any given packet can take any number of different routes, all of which are changing at any moment.

Unfortunately, these multipath topographies can’t easily be visualized using traditional network monitoring tools. There’s simply not enough time in the day to diagram the network, let alone proactively monitor the application traffic and hardware links that comprise it.

The answer lies in finding a network performance monitoring tool that combines multipath monitoring with traditional infrastructure monitoring for greater visibility into network security.  Having this insight will allow federal network pros to proactively manage multiple networks, identify issues, and fix them before they get out of hand.

A smarter and more collaborative defense

Network resiliency can be achieved at scale, but it will take a concerted effort. Through greater collaboration between the DoD and private sector, as well as the adoption AIOps-powered observability, the DoD will be better prepared to manage and secure increasingly complex, dynamic military network environments.

 

To learn more about SolarWinds’ AIOps-powered Hybrid Cloud Observability Solution, click here.

Ransomware in Healthcare and Utilities

Carahsoft Ransomware Cybersecurity Blog Series Blog 2 Embedded Image 2023

The past two years have seen relentless cyberattacks employed by hostile nations to disrupt American security, public health and the economy. The current U.S. administration has announced its emphasis on fighting ransomware particularly within these critical infrastructures. New regulations are underway for 4 of the 16 sectors including healthcare and water, which is a part of the utilities sector.[1] In anticipation of the coming changes, here is a look into the current state of ransomware in healthcare and utilities, both of which have experienced some of the worst cyberattacks in recent years. By understanding the challenges in these fields, IT administrators can work to evaluate their individual organizational cybersecurity status and start to resolve issues before the enforcement of the new regulations begin.

USE CASE: HEALTHCARE

Unlike ransomware attacks on other sectors, cyberattacks within healthcare are threat-to-life crimes instead of economic crimes because they impede hospital operations and critical patient care. Ransomware attacks by foreign cybercriminals on hospitals are analogous to military strikes against healthcare facilities, which violate international warfare laws. Because of this, it is not only an IT system concern but a healthcare-wide risk that must be addressed with grave importance.

Recent Attacks

In 2020, Universal Health Services network was hacked by the Ryuk variant of ransomware resulting in all its IT systems shutting down and operations stopping at 250 hospitals. According to a Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) report, the incident ultimately cost $67 million in lost revenue and recovery although $26 million was covered by cyber insurance.[2]

The devastating ransomware attack against Scripps Health in May 2021 cost the company $112.7 million with over a month of cleanup and extensive revenue loss. [2]  In light of this rise in attacks, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) and HHS all issued admonitions that hospitals and health systems be on alert and strengthen their ransomware protection and emergency plans.[3]

Impact

On average, the HHS reported that each healthcare cyberattack cost $10.10 million including the ransom, business loss and remediation costs, ranking it as the most expensive sector for cyberattacks across all industries.[4] This is 41.6% higher than in 2020.[2]  Often, criminals target the healthcare sector because of the quantity and sensitivity of data available. Hospitals are also particularly susceptible due to the complexity of the IT infrastructure, 24/7 operations and the strong repercussions to the reputation of the organization, making them more likely to pay the ransom if an attack happens. Many healthcare organizations also employ a lot of legacy equipment and software as well as perform extensive amounts of file-sharing with many vulnerable endpoints. These areas are a security concern but some of these older systems are also imperative for regular operations and certain medical software to run.[4]

In addition to the immediate disturbance of operations, all of these hacks expose millions of patient records. For the general population, these healthcare breaches have tripled in their impact between 2018 and 2021, with 14 million people affected to now over 45 million. According to the HHS, healthcare institutions faced 373 ransomware attacks from January to July 2022.[2]  Cyber disruptions’ impact through delayed care in areas with poorer healthcare is magnified even more. Northwell Health’s Senior Vice President and Chief Quality Officer Mark Jarrett says: “Clinicians in general tend to think of this as an information technology issue, and it really isn’t. It’s a patient safety issue.”[5]

Carahsoft Ransomware Cybersecurity Blog Series Blog 2 Infographic Image 2023

Post-Attack Measures

Because of the unfortunate success of ransomware within healthcare, many institutions are seeking cyber insurance to offset the cost. The high number of incidents, however, has made it more difficult to obtain coverage until substantial cyber security defenses are in place.[6] While 79% of healthcare organizations possess cyber insurance, nearly all of them have had to improve their cybersecurity strategies to maintain coverage including incorporating new technologies, more employee training and other system process changes.[6]

The Censinet and the Ponemon Institute report, “The Impact of Ransomware on Healthcare During COVID-19 and Beyond,” noted that most healthcare institutions budget 3-4% of IT spending towards cybersecurity while financial firms spend an average of 6-14% to combat cybercrimes.[7] When healthcare systems invest in more cyber defenses, the overall impact of ransomware is dramatically lessened. For institutions with fully deployed cyber security measures, an IMB Security’s annual breach report discovered a 65.2% reduction in average breach cost and 74-day shorter detection and containment cycle versus companies without. This decreased the cost from $6.20 million to $3.15 million for those with security and a breach lifecycle of 323 days down to 249.[2] These results speak to the importance of implementing comprehensive cybersecurity protection and remediation tools in the healthcare sector.

USE CASE: UTILITIES

Similar to healthcare, ransomware attacks to the utilities sector are not just costly and inconvenient, they also impede critical infrastructure and have a wide impact radius to public health, safety and the companies’ bottom line. Utilities also underscore every aspect of daily life through electricity, oil, water and natural gas.

Recent Attacks

In May 2021, the Colonial Pipeline attack brought ransomware in utilities to the forefront of the public eye. The incident affected 45% of the fuel supply used on the U.S. East Coast, which generated a steep price increase and public panic.[8] Within two hours of access, the cyber criminals immobilized 100GB of critical data. As a result, the 5,500-mile pipeline system was closed for six days until the company paid $4.4 million in cryptocurrency as ransom. Reuters lists this cyber event as the most disruptive ransomware attack on record.[9]

Following the Colonial Pipeline hack, Congress issued a strong cybersecurity measure requiring critical infrastructure organizations to report an attack in three days and any payment of the ransom within one day. The goal is to increase information sharing and better equip the government to assist in these situations.[10]

Another large cyberattack in 2021 occurred in Florida when cybercriminals infiltrated the water treatment facility’s network through dormant software and spiked the sodium hydroxide level to 100 times its usual amount. Although the attack was detected and neutralized, the event unveiled a huge vulnerability in U.S. water systems due to minimal IT budgets, staffing shortages causing maintenance delays, outdated cybersecurity systems and other factors, making it easier for cybercriminals to breach the system unnoticed. Shortly after the news of the Florida water hack, three additional water treatment plant attacks across the country that had not been reported came to the surface.[11] Research indicates that this situation represents a consistent trend. Although large attacks on well-known businesses are often featured more in the news, small businesses experience more ransomware attacks but they commonly go unreported.[12] The limited resources available often make smaller local government and enterprises a preferred target for ransomware because it is more difficult for them to recover from an attack, thus making them more likely to pay the ransom quickly.[13]

Impact

Carahsoft Ransomware Cybersecurity Blog Series Blog 2-2 Infographic Image 2023

These major attacks in 2021 followed an already heightened evaluation of utilities’ security due to Executive Order 13636, which initiated the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Cyber Security Framework of 2014,[14a] and the America’s Water Infrastructure Act of 2018,[14b] which required water systems threat risk and resilience assessments to be completed between March 2020 and June 2021.

Post-Attack Measures

Utilities companies often rely on a data backup strategy that replicates the system to a second data center if the primary server fails. This setup works well for natural disasters, but companies must be aware that the infection can also be duplicated on non-segmented backup copies which hackers prioritize attacking as well.

Within the electric power sector, operational technology (OT) is widely spread across data centers’ locations and connected through dedicated cables which allows additional control over networking. This however, increases the attack surface and restricts the network’s ability to adapt and reroute traffic to another safe location in the event of a cyberattack, because the system is hardwired to be isolated.[15] Companies must be careful not to assume the direct lines would be inherently secure and should continue to conduct system monitoring especially as these networks start connecting to other systems. In addition to geographical and system complexities, many utility organizations also have decentralized cybersecurity leadership, which can contribute to post-attack confusion and a lack of clarity on the recovery plan.[16]

While demonstrating the return on investment (ROI) of cybersecurity strategies can be a challenge until an attack has occurred, experts highlight the value of these measures by pointing out the impact that a compromised system can have on a company and the general public.[9]  With cybersecurity, success is ultimately demonstrated by the absence of cyber incidents. In the past, this led to a reluctance to invest in necessary cyber measures; however, this awareness is shifting as more companies are joining the initiative to secure their systems and networks.

In July 2022, national security advisors announced additional cybersecurity requirements will be instituted soon by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to defend national water systems from hackers.[17] To prepare for these new guidelines, companies within the utilities sector must evaluate their systems and work to improve their defenses and recovery plans now in the face of ransomware attacks.

LOOKING AHEAD

Critical infrastructure across the country has been overwhelmed by the influx of ransomware and data breaches. Looking at the data projections for the coming years reveals that these intrusions will continue to grow at an alarming rate. While legislation develops to address the current cybersecurity gaps, sectors like healthcare and utilities must actively take initiative to address system weaknesses and make it more difficult for cybercriminals to infiltrate. Investing in the necessary changes and updates is crucial for U.S. critical infrastructure organizations before their individual institutions become the next target. Now more than ever is the time to modernize infrastructure, get ahead of cyber requirements and build resilience against the threat landscape.

 

Learn about steps to address these cybersecurity concerns whether in healthcare and utilities or across all sectors in our Ransomware Security Strategies Blog. Find our full Ransomware Series here.

 

Resources

[1] “FACT SHEET: Biden-⁠Harris Administration Delivers on Strengthening America’s Cybersecurity,” The White House, https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2022/10/11/fact-sheet-biden-harris-administration-delivers-on-strengthening-americas-cybersecurity/

[2] “Healthcare data breach costs reach record high at $10M per attack: IBM report,” Fierce Healthcare, https://www.fiercehealthcare.com/health-tech/healthcare-data-breach-costs-reach-record-high-10m-attack-ibm-report

[3] “Ransomware attacks on hospitals could soon surge, FBI warns,” CNET, https://www.cnet.com/news/privacy/fbi-warns-imminent-wave-of-ransomware-attacks-hitting-hospitals/

[4] “Ransomware 101 For Healthcare,” Forbes, https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbestechcouncil/2022/08/16/ransomware-101-for-healthcare/?sh=3bb3ca785b86

[5] “The pandemic revealed the health risks of hospital ransomware attacks,” The Verge, https://www.theverge.com/2021/8/19/22632378/pandemic-ransomware-health-risks

[7] “Ransomware in healthcare: it’s a matter of life and death,” NTT, https://services.global.ntt/en-us/insights/blog/ransomware-in-healthcare

[8] “Everything You Need to Know About Ransomware,” Ransomware.org, https://ransomware.org/

[9] “Ransomware Attacks in the Energy Industry,” CDW, https://www.cdw.com/content/cdw/en/articles/security/ransomware-attacks-energy-industry.html

[11] “The Critical Need to Protect Critical Infrastructure: Spotlight on Utilities,” Spy Cloud, https://spycloud.com/protect-critical-infrastructure-utilities-ransomware-ato/

[12] “How Utilities Can Reduce the Risk of Ransomware Attacks,” Energy Central, https://energycentral.com/c/pip/how-utilities-can-reduce-risk-ransomware-attacks

[13] “Ransomware Hits U.S. Electric Utility,” Trend Micro, https://www.trendmicro.com/vinfo/us/security/news/cybercrime-and-digital-threats/ransomware-hits-u-s-electric-utility

[14a] “NIST Releases Cybersecurity Framework Version 1.0,” NIST, https://www.nist.gov/news-events/news/2014/02/nist-releases-cybersecurity-framework-version-10#:~:text=In%20February%202013%2C%20President%20Obama,help%20organizations%20manage%20cyber%20risks

[14b] “What Does the New American’s Water Infrastructure Act (AWAI) of 2018 Mean to You?” Crawford, Murphy & Tilly, Inc., https://www.cmtengr.com/2019/08/20/americans-water-infrastructure-act/

[15] “How energy and utility companies can recover from ransomware and other disasters using infrastructure as code on AWS,” AWS, https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/industries/how-energy-and-utility-companies-can-recover-from-ransomware-and-other-disasters-using-iac-on-aws/

[16] “Ransomware and Energy and Utilities,” AT&T Business https://cybersecurity.att.com/blogs/security-essentials/ransomware-and-energy-and-utilities

[17] “White House Official: EPA to Issue Cybersecurity Rule for Water Facilities,” Nextgov, https://www.nextgov.com/cybersecurity/2022/07/epa-issue-cybersecurity-rule-water-facilities-white-house-official/375098/

Infographic Resources:

[6] “The State of Ransomware in Healthcare 2022,” Sophos, https://news.sophos.com/en-us/2022/06/01/the-state-of-ransomware-in-healthcare-2022/

[10] “Looking Back at the Colonial Pipeline Ransomware Incident,” Government Technology, https://www.govtech.com/blogs/lohrmann-on-cybersecurity/looking-back-at-the-colonial-pipeline-ransomware-incident

“The 2021 Ransomware Risk Pulse: Energy Sector,” Black Kite, https://blackkite.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/The-2021-Ransomware-Risk-Pulse-_-Energy-Sector.pdf