Why OSINT is Crucial to Having a Comprehensive Security Strategy

The landscape of intelligence gathering has evolved dramatically since the 1990s and early 2000s. Back then, accessing and utilizing information effectively was a major challenge, especially for Government agencies tasked with monitoring threats. Intelligence gathering was often a manual process, with significant gaps in communication and real-time analysis. Today technology has bridged those gaps, and organizations are more equipped than ever to gather and act upon threat intelligence.

At the heart of this evolution is open source intelligence (OSINT). OSINT refers to the collection and analysis of information that is publicly available from a variety of sources, such as websites, social media platforms, blogs, news outlets and more. This data is processed to derive actionable insights for decision making, security operations and threat detection. By leveraging OSINT, organizations can gather, analyze and deliver real-time data to enhance security and operational effectiveness.

Leveraging OSINT

When it comes to cyber operations, effectively leveraging OSINT can provide a significant advantage. Without strong intelligence, it becomes difficult to move from strategic planning to tactical and operational execution. Threats often begin long before a hacker breaches a network, with adversaries gathering intelligence on their targets over time. A holistic approach is critical—whether focusing on offensive or defensive cyber strategies—because gaps in understanding can lead to vulnerabilities and unintended consequences.

Recorded Future OSINT Blog Embedded Image 2024

A useful framework for understanding OSINT’s role is the information-to-risk pyramid. At its base, monitoring and telemetry are essential for providing context to potential threats. Many organizations rely on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS), a standardized framework for evaluating and ranking the severity of software vulnerabilities, to help prioritize and address the most critical risks first. However, this system alone may not provide a complete picture. Integrating additional intelligence can reveal that vulnerabilities are actively exploited, making them far more dangerous.

Once threats are identified, organizations can bring in key stakeholders to formulate strategic responses. Risk owners, often from the business side, play a critical role alongside IT in decision-making. Government agencies, with their vast networks and resources, face these challenges on an even larger scale. In today’s environment seconds matter, and OSINT plays a pivotal role in crafting strategic plans to mitigate risks in real time.

The Human Factor

While technology plays a crucial role in OSINT, the human factor remains just as important. Analysts are at the heart of making OSINT actionable, reviewing alerts and correlating information. Integrating intelligence through application programming interface (API) calls can enhance this process, allowing organizations to combine telemetry data with open source information (OSIF).

Networks in large organizations are complex, generating thousands of security information and event management (SIEM) alerts daily, leading to alert fatigue. In such environments, timely responses are crucial. Adversaries can breach networks quickly, often within hours, so the ability to act decisively is vital to preventing significant losses. By focusing on critical alerts rather than false alarms, analysts can address the real threats.

Aligning OSINT tools with governance, risk management and compliance (GRC) can help organizations reduce vulnerabilities and enhance their overall security resilience. By understanding risks, organizations can effectively apply technology to secure their assets and ensure uninterrupted operations.

The Cost of Inaction

Turning gathered intelligence into actionable insights is vital, particularly for safeguarding critical infrastructure. As highlighted by FBI Director Christopher Wray, advanced persistent threats (APTs) are increasingly targeting essential sectors like energy, water and transportation. Today’s cybercriminals are no longer just interested in attacking networks to boast about their successes; they are targeting specific organizations.

Beyond direct attacks, adversaries may also infiltrate networks to understand how organizations and systems operate. Networking devices—especially in small office and home (SoHo) environments—are often the weakest links, frequently overlooked despite their vulnerability. While organizations regularly patch servers and monitor critical systems, these networking devices, particularly near sensitive areas like military bases or airports, can be soft targets. Once compromised, attackers can use local IP addresses to stay within the network, gathering information to plan more sophisticated attacks.

Furthermore, the threats extend beyond financial loss. Data privacy and the long-term impact of breaches must also be considered. Publicly traded companies face regulatory scrutiny from agencies like the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Federal Trade Commission (FTC). With new regulations such as Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act (CIRCIA) on the horizon in 2025, organizations will be required to report incidents promptly. Failing to protect sensitive data can result in costly fines and reputational damage, long after the breach has been resolved.

The Future of Cybersecurity is Proactive

Cybersecurity is a continuous operation that requires vigilance and adaptability. In an era where adversaries are patient and highly organized, an organization’s ability to identify and respond to threats effectively enables them to be not only reactive but proactive, addressing risks before they become crises. OSINT is no longer optional; it is a strategic necessity for organizations aiming to protect their assets, reputation and future.

To learn more about harnessing OSINT to enhance situational awareness, intelligence gathering and strategic decision making watch Recorded Future’s webinar “The Importance of OSINT in Defense Operations.”

Raising Agencies’ Cyber Intelligence

Nationwide, many government agencies are realizing that traditional approaches to cybersecurity are no longer enough to protect against increasingly sophisticated adversaries and navigate a complex threat landscape. For example, cybersecurity strategies have historically focused on the perimeter, ignoring the risk of internal threats and failing to account for mobile devices or teleworking employees. In an era of tightening budgets and rising citizen expectations, government must adapt to these modern realities. Cyber intelligence uses behavior analytics, network visibility, and operational and threat intelligence to make agencies smarter about today’s threats. If your agency is in need of a forward-looking cybersecurity approach, get up to date with “Raising Agencies’ Cyber Intelligence,” a guide created by GovLoop and Carahsoft featuring insights from the following technology and government cyber intelligence thought leaders.

GovLoop Cyber Intelligence Guide Blog Embedded ImageStorytelling with Intelligence-Led Security

“Too often, agency leaders and cybersecurity analysts seem like they’re speaking separate languages. With both sides communicating about cyberthreats differently, getting everyone on the same page is one of contemporary government’s greatest challenges. The wider the gulf between an agency’s teams, the more vulnerable it is to external danger. Today’s security landscape contains dangers everywhere, and cyberthreats won’t wait for agency workforces to unite against them. Agencies that don’t speak the same language as their employees and employees that don’t speak the same language as their agency leaders will find themselves constantly fighting cybersecurity fires.”

Read more insights from Recorded Future’s Threat Intelligence Analyst, Allan Liska.

 

Leveraging Zero Trust Against Cyberattacks

“Agencies aren’t looking just at the “north-south” of traffic moving inside their network perimeters for threats. Lateral cyberattacks occur when perpetrators breach agencies’ defenses and then move freely “sideways” or “east-west” on their networks. The modus-operandi of cybercriminals today is to seek a weakly defended element, and then access sensitive data by moving laterally to avoid stronger safeguards. This protection against lateral movement is what zero trust cybersecurity is all about. By automatically distrusting everything on and off their networks, agencies can enhance their IT security.”

Read more insights from Trend Micro’s Vice President of Cybersecurity, Greg Young.

Threat Intelligence: The Context Agencies Crave

“Basic cybersecurity knowledge — such as which attacks are most common — won’t always keep agencies’ data safe. For scores of agencies, today’s threat landscape can change too fast for their workforces. Fortunately, threat intelligence can prepare agencies for cutting-edge dangers. Threat intelligence adds the context agencies need by focusing on the latest threats in realtime. […] The worst cyber attacks are the ones agencies never see coming. But with quality threat intelligence, agencies can stay alert to where cyberthreats might strike next.”

Read more insights from Fire Eye’s Principal Analyst, Luke McNamara.

Pairing Man and Machine on Zero Trust

“Since the COVID-19 pandemic began, the number of endpoints to defend has exploded as government employees started working remotely. These endpoints include devices such as laptops, smartphones and tablets, and they are leaving agencies more vulnerable than before. Going forward, the more endpoints agencies have, the more targets they will present to cyberthreats. […] Zero trust cybersecurity addresses de-perimeterization, or the gradual erosion of network boundaries. With zero trust, users must be capable of securely accessing data from anywhere no matter where it resides.”

Read more insights from Blackberry Limited’s Vice President of Global Sales Engineering, Rich Thompson.

Prioritizing Cyber Intelligence at the Defense Logistics Agency

“One of the things I would tell you is more of a concern than it has been in the past is the large number of endpoints that are seated on our networks today, especially with mass telework becoming the norm over the last few months. Identifying and confirming anomalies and positive, adverse actions has become more difficult. It has amped up our attention on automation, machine learning and robotic process automation and bringing that into the fold to a greater degree across the cybersecurity spectrum. It is almost a must now because of the massive amounts of data to sift through to get to what you’re seeking.”

Read more insights from DLA’s CIO, George Duchak, and Director of Cybersecurity, Linus Baker.

Minnesota Chief Information Security Officer Explains Zero Trust Cybersecurity

“Unlike other types of attacks where weapons require certain tactical research, there is a low effort in the cyberthreat domain. The global threat landscape will continue to have new entrants as actors build strengths and develop talent. There’s this model of a cyber kill chain. It talks about how attackers move from discovery all the way to mission completion, whatever the mission might be. If we build layers of defenses that look at that cyber kill chain, can we identify the mission actions through that cycle before the mission completes?”

Read more insights from Minnesota Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) and Minnesota IT Services’ (MNIT) Assistant Commissioner, Rohit Tandon.

Understanding DoD’s Cyber Hotline

“Picture the Vulnerability Disclosure Program (VDP) as the hotline for reporting DoD’s cybersecurity shortcomings. Nestled in DoD’s Cyber Crime Center (DC3), the program makes the philosophy of “see something, say something” digital. At any time, ethical hackers can alert DoD to issues ranging from insecure networks to noncompliance with cybersecurity standards such as FISMA.”

Read more insights from DoD’s Director of the Vulnerability Disclosure Program, Kris Johnson.

Download the full GovLoop Guide for more insights from these cyber intelligence thought leaders and additional government interviews, historical perspectives and industry research on zero trust, the government threat landscape and the latest developments from government programs like CDM.