Locking Down Information Management Security on Campus

According to one report, ransomware attacks against higher education doubled in 2020 compared to 2019, with an average ransom demand of $447,000. Traditionally, criminals tended to be opportunists; they’d strike at random and hope to get lucky. Now they’ve organized into highly sophisticated networks and cartels that will target any entity of substance they consider a viable target. Higher ed fits the profile, but some institutions are better positioned to withstand cybersecurity attacks than others. A combination of zero-trust and defense-in-depth allows these schools to defend against malware and ransomware. Ultimately, the job of the cybersecurity professional in higher ed is to “plan for the worst day,” as one cybersecurity expert recently noted during a Campus Technology leadership summit. But how can agencies overcome these obstacles to adapt to an increasingly targeted and threatening cybersecurity landscape? Learn how your institution can safeguard against threats, overcome evolving technical demands, and more in Carahsoft’s Innovation in Education report.

 

Gaining Total Visibility

“We can no longer piece together a set of disparate tools to solve acute security or compliance issues. Really, the only way forward is to use a mix of integrated security technologies that deliver, first, a view into traffic and, second, a flexible enforcement model that relies on artificial intelligence and machine learning to identify attacks. The solution starts and ends with visibility. The goal is to understand how data flows through the network, cloud and endpoints so that IT can provide a consistent security view no matter how services are being used. It’s important to understand how your users are tapping those services and to surface those things that traditional tools can’t see. As one example, we have a service called Xpanse, which will take an outside-in view of the network and start to build relationships, looking at how endpoints are interacting with other endpoints that are outside of the network, contributing to the building of a map showing how the institution is connected to the rest of the world.”

Read more insights from Palo Alto Networks’ Security Strategist, Hunter Ely.

 

A Unifying Viewpoint for Security

IIE Campus Tech June Info Management Security Blog Embedded Image 2021“Automation of the easy security work — known threats, known responses, malware detection, cleanup — addresses both problems, and everybody wins. The campus gains better operational success. And when humans don’t have to intervene with the ordinary, they’re free to do more interesting work. They grow in their positions, because they’re not just clicking buttons all day. Automation is especially important in an era of remote status quo and zero-trust. IT has to assume that there’s a high probability of any authentication request being nefarious. And that means being able to look at data in context: Is this person at a higher risk? Is the laptop or smartphone compromised? Should we let them on the network today? Have we scanned this device in the last three days? Then let’s not allow them access to this HR data. If they get their machine scanned, then they can come back and try again. While higher ed has long been predicated on allowing open access, now that can only happen when it’s the appropriate thing to do. Users have to be classified — student, researcher, staffer — and access has to be controlled. When everything looks normal, they get unfettered access. But when their machine or account is compromised, the access should be denied. Easier said than done, right?”

Read more insights from Splunk’s Minister of Magic, Jesse Trucks.

 

AI and the Carrot Approach to Zero-Trust Network Access

“Some 20 years ago, I was outfitted with a BlackBerry device, and it was the first time I could get e-mail from the road. But it wasn’t the built-in keyboard that made that device so special. It was really the fact that my organization’s IT department trusted the BlackBerry security model so deeply, I could use my device to access sensitive corporate information. BlackBerry’s mission hasn’t changed. But now, that security emphasis is used to secure some 500 million endpoints — including cars — produced by various companies. That’s why higher education has rediscovered BlackBerry. The university IT organization trusts the company to keep devices secure, whether they’re owned by the institution or individual people — students, staff or faculty. And now, without having to use a college-owned device that navigates through the college-owned firewall, users can once again be liberated, just like we were two decades ago, when we first got a taste of the freedom allowed by mobility.”

Read more insights from BlackBerry’s Director of Sales, Chris Russo.

 

Protecting the Campus from the Outside In

“Is it any wonder threats are on the rise? As the number of system and data breaches rack up in higher education, security experts have adopted a defense-in-depth stance. Putting multiple defensive measures in place begins with a baseline security posture that wants to understand everything coming into and going out of the network, preferably in real time. The tricky part is achieving that level of visibility and response when the threats could originate from any one of the many thousands of devices accessing institutional resources. One route is deploying domain name system (DNS) security. Let’s think about DNS for a moment. It may be decades-old but it’s still heavily relied upon; without it, the entire network is shut off from the internet. Regardless of their location, endpoints require DNS to connect to any application, service or data source. And so does malware, which uses DNS at multiple stages of an attack. That’s why DNS is a marvelous transport system for malfeasance. Traditional security mechanisms don’t police it well because there’s so much of it — millions of DNS queries a day for the typical university.”

Read more insights from Infoblox’s Director and General Manager for U.S. Education, Rufus Coleman.

 

Uncovering the Hidden Costs of Cloud Security

“While the public cloud has been a boon for higher education on many fronts, it has also become a conundrum, especially when it comes to storage for the purposes of security and safety. As the needs add up, so does the expense. The first not-so-hidden cost is the baseline cost of data storage. As an example, think about the capacity required to sustain video recordings of people entering and exiting buildings on campus. A network of 100 cameras, each capturing 8 frames per second with a modest resolution of 720 pixels, operating continuously at just medium quality, would require 200 terabytes of capacity. On Amazon Web Services, the cost for storing 200 TB on S3 would be about $56,000 for the year. If the institution were to upgrade to newer cameras capturing 15 frames per second at 1080 pixels, generating five times as much data — a full petabyte — the expense would quintuple, to about $289,000. Microsoft Azure would be slightly under that ($262,000) and Google Cloud a bit more ($327,000). Second, there is the additional hidden cost of the traditional route those cloud storage providers follow for transactions related to the data. They’ve all predicated the value of their services on fractional pricing (a tenth of a penny for this, a couple of pennies for that) for seemingly insignificant activities, such as egress or API requests.”

Read more insights from Wasabi’s Senior Director of Product Marketing, David Boland.

 

Staying on Top of Cybersecurity: A Conversation with Two University CISOs

“In March 2020, I was feeling more comfortable in terms of what our border looked like and the things that we were protecting our constituents from. Then the pandemic happened and people started grabbing devices off of their desks and old laptops out of storage closets and dragging them home to put on home networks — and who knows how they were being secured, if they were being secured at all. I thought I had a fairly good plan in place and tools deployed across my infrastructure to protect us, but that was all out the window. And so, over the last year we’ve been looking at services and products we can deploy that will protect our users as well at home as we could when they were on campus. And there’s nothing like having a community of your peers to have those conversations with and to learn what they’re doing, how long it took them to get there, what bumps they ran into along the way and ultimately, how they were able to steer around those. That’s significantly beneficial to all of us, and that is a huge value of participating with Internet2 overall and through the NET+ program for specific cloud and security solutions.”

Read more insights from Tom Dugas, CISO for Duquesne University, and Rick Haugerud, CISO for the University of Nebraska-Lincoln.

 

Community-Powered Problem-Solving

“We facilitate the community engaging with each other to identify best practices. For example, let’s say there’s a particular challenge that a campus is trying to figure out. They may go into a community call, where campuses can ask their peers: How do you solve this problem? And then they can get immediate feedback. Or there are many ways institutions collaborate digitally, including e-mail lists, Slack channels and wikis, where they can engage with peers to identify best practices. That is all part of the NET+ program, where advisory boards and community events help to foster more optimal service offerings and benchmarking. And a program manager like myself is engaged with and supports these types of discussions. After a number of campuses have verbalized similar challenges, we’ll realize maybe there’s something there that we need to write up, to share broadly with the community, where they can look at a frequently asked questions repository and find the answers to their questions. And that’s even faster than going and asking their peers.”

Read more insights from Internet2’s Program Manager for Security and Identity, Nick Lewis.

 

Download the full Innovation in Education report for more insights from these cybersecurity thought leaders and additional industry research from CampusTech.

Current Cybersecurity Trends: The Next Wave of Cybersecurity

The coronavirus pandemic escalated government adoption of technologies like artificial intelligence, cloud, and the internet of things, as entire workforces shifted to telework. But just as agencies have adopted modern tech at record speeds, so too have cyber adversaries – and the rapid adoption of new solutions may create exploitable blind spots and gaps in security. Perimeter-less cloud-based systems present unique cybersecurity challenges, including maintaining visibility into a complex mix of cloud and on-premises systems. Grappling with the new reality of cloud-based environments requires government agencies to explore new strategies and best practices – including adopting a zero trust mindset, monitoring employee cyber hygiene, and investing in cybersecurity tools capable of simplifying complex tasks. Read the latest insights from industry thought leaders in cybersecurity in Carahsoft’s Innovation in Government® report.

 

IIG FCW August 2020 Blog ImageHow Employees Can Boost Cybersecurity

“Security controls are even more important in a world of perimeterless IT environments and expanding cloud adoption. Agencies need to appropriately budget for cybersecurity and apply the basic hygiene of security patching and vulnerability assessment. Those steps can cover about 80% of basic threats, and the security team can focus its energy on more complex threats. Having a strong team is the foundation of those efforts, but it’s not easy to recruit private-sector cybersecurity professionals for government jobs. An alternative is to recruit from within. The government should consider creating programs to train IT team members to take on higher-level cybersecurity roles, which helps agencies build effective teams and helps employees progress on a career path. Whether they bring in new talent or train existing employees, agencies must offer competitive salaries and benefits to keep cybersecurity professionals satisfied and engaged.”

Read more insights from SolarWinds’s Vice President of Products and Application Management, Jim Hansen.

 

A Better Approach to Telework Security

“This large-scale shift to working from home introduces interesting challenges for government agencies. How do they secure a growing number of remote devices while keeping employees productive? How do they enforce least privilege while allowing end users to perform necessary tasks? How do agencies secure devices, access and systems when the network perimeter has been stretched to support large numbers of remote workers? Some IT leaders have committed to VPNs or remote desktop access, both of which can be difficult to secure and scale. Devices are still at risk when they’re not connected to the VPN or remote access technology because of vulnerabilities in the home network. For example, agencies can’t protect against a family member or housemate using an employee’s home computer. They may also not be able to enforce whether or not basic software, such as antivirus or OS, is up-to-date on a personal device. The situation fundamentally requires a shift to the cloud.”

Read more insights from BeyondTrust’s CTO and CISO, Morey J. Haber.

 

Rethinking Security in the Age of COVID-19

“Although agencies are focused on telework security, they also need to think about what’s over the next hill. They should be aware that sequestration is likely just around the corner. Given the mounting deficit due to the pandemic-related stimulus package, I believe flat will be the new up for agency budgets, and when IT allocations shrink, security is often deprioritized. Now is the time to find smart ways to spend money. Agencies should look for multifunctional solutions, such as software-defined networking, and choose options that are intrinsically secure. Fortunately, we are on the cusp of a revolution driven by the intersection between the platform-based approach to cybersecurity and increasingly mature artificial intelligence. That convergence will tip the balance from attacker to defender.”

Read more insights from Fortinet’s Public-Sector Field CISO, Jim Richberg.

 

Visibility and the Quest for Zero Trust

“For the foreseeable future, agencies will use a blend of on-premises data centers, virtual environments, and public and private clouds. To better manage and protect those resources, agencies must have maximum visibility into all their data, including data in transit and encrypted data. A unified solution that provides pervasive visibility and manages information from a single pane of glass is increasingly important. That visibility enhances the security tools agencies are already using to defend their networks and improves the way they detect, investigate and respond to cybersecurity threats. In addition, zero trust architecture has gained a lot of momentum in the federal government. However, although agencies report that 80% or more of their network traffic is encrypted, we have seen that only about 30% is actually inspected. It’s a significant blind spot that must be addressed. Without pervasive visibility into data in motion — whether it’s in a physical or cloud-based environment — agencies can’t implement a zero trust architecture.”

Read more insights from Gigamon’s Vice President of Public Sector, Dennis Reilly.

 

The Growing Need for Asset Management

“More people are acting in decentralized ways right now, but that decentralization is part of a larger trend. Multi-month strategic plans are becoming a thing of the past, and fewer IT purchases go through the CIO’s office. According to researchers, over half of IT spending is now done by line-of-business leaders, not by a central function such as a CIO. Therefore, agencies must have a simple, comprehensive process for gaining insight into technologies as they’re added to the network. Otherwise, more security gaps will invariably occur. Those gaps are exacerbated by the pandemic because agencies cannot easily add secure data center capacity to support large-scale telework. It’s much easier to use a government purchase card to address a pressing need for videoconferencing, for example. But even approved cloud products and services are not secure by default. They need to be continuously monitored.”

Read more insights from Expanse’s CTO and Co-Founder, Matt Kraning.

 

The Key to Securing Cloud Resources

“The recent surge in telework affects the vast majority of government employees, including IT teams. But it is a challenge to manage and secure servers and other infrastructure located inside agency data centers without being able to physically access those resources. Given the restrictions on sending employees into government offices, many agencies are accelerating their move to cloud-based infrastructures, which essentially transfers the responsibility for physically managing servers to the cloud platform providers. Moving to the cloud is a logical and essential step toward enabling remote IT employees to gain access to systems and data, but it also expands the systems an agency must manage and heightens the need to control access to them.”

Read more insights from Centrify’s Chief Strategy Officer, David McNeely.

 

Adopting a New Defensive Strategy

“Threat actors are shifting their tactics to take advantage of your now decentralized workforce, which means the nature of your enterprise defines your threat landscape. To use a sports analogy, two teams face off against each other on a football field. The offensive line’s actions are executed to make it to the defender’s end zone. The line between the two is clearly defined, and each opposing team adjusts its actions to take advantage of the other’s potential gaps. Two factors come into play: visibility into how the opposing team is lined up and what plays it usually executes in that situation. In cyber, this requires visibility into where your teammates are, what your gaps are, where the opposing force is and what plays it may execute to take advantage of those gaps.”

Read more insights from Infoblox’s Principal Security Architect, Chris Usserman.

 

Why AI Transforms Cybersecurity

“The focus of protection has long been moving to the endpoint, but now that move is more pronounced than ever. However, agencies can no longer rely on a network to gain visibility into those end-user devices and know whether they are protected and what resources users are accessing. All that insight now happens via the endpoint rather than the firewall. The distributed nature of the workforce makes it harder to control where devices are and sometimes even to provision them. Along with allowing remote work, agencies must also allow remote security. That means they need to be able to monitor all those endpoints via the cloud, and devices need to have embedded mechanisms that deliver real-time protection regardless of cloud connectivity.”

Read more insights from SentinelOne’s Co-Founder and CEO, Tomer Weingarten.

 

A Unified Approach to Visibility and Security

“In one recent example of the growing sophistication of adversaries, Trustwave conducted a threat hunt that led to the discovery of a new malware family dubbed GoldenSpy. The malware was found embedded in tax payment software required for conducting business operations in China. GoldenSpy essentially is a backdoor that allows adversaries to inject malware or spyware into the company’s network. Even if you uninstall the tax software, the backdoor remains. Countering such threats requires coordinating a complex mix of on-premises, hybrid and multi-cloud environments. Furthermore, although a cloud provider typically offers security tools for securing data on its platform, those tools often won’t work across other cloud environments or give agencies complete visibility.”

Read more insights from Trustwave Government Solutions’s President Bill Rucker.

 

How to Build Stronger Security Teams

“Based on the lessons we’ve learned during the coronavirus pandemic, government networks may permanently become virtual, remote environments. The old approaches often don’t scale well for remote users, so the focus must shift to credentials and how to protect them. As computing resources move to the cloud, the credential is what glues everything together. Network defenders need to be able to record each action associated with a credential and know whether that behavior is normal or abnormal. With agencies operating in a complex mix of cloud and on-premises environments, it can be difficult to understand what’s going on and, more important, what’s normal and what’s abnormal. Machine learning through modeling allows agencies to answer those questions more quickly, more efficiently and with a higher degree of confidence than humans can.”

Read more insights from Exabeam’s Chief Security Strategist, Steve Moore.

 

Ripple20: A Mission-Critical Risk

“Forescout worked with JSOF, which first uncovered Ripple20, to identify the devices and vendors impacted by these vulnerabilities. JSOF estimates that hundreds of millions of internet of things and operational technology (OT) devices are at risk, and they are as varied as printers, uninterruptible power supplies, medical infusion pumps and industrial control systems. In short, Ripple20 can disrupt mission-critical technology that security teams typically don’t spend much time managing and sometimes can’t manage because the embedded software is not accessible. Unfortunately, that means there is no single manufacturer with a practiced way to fix the software. Instead, the burden falls on security teams to understand and mitigate the risk.”

Read more insights from Forescout Technologies’ Director of Federal Civilian Agencies, Erik Floden.

Download the full Innovation in Government® report for more insights from these Government Cloud Security thought leaders and additional industry research from FCW.

Your Guide to Mission-Driven Cybersecurity

Over the years, the federal government has created a series of mandates to promote better cybersecurity practices and solutions. Today, three such mandates guide most agency efforts: the Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program (FedRAMP) for cloud security; the Continuous Diagnostics and Mitigation (CDM) program for network visibility and data security; and the Trusted Internet Connections (TIC) program for internet-based security. These mandates are increasingly seen as interlocking pieces of a larger puzzle. That puzzle is this: How can agencies create a more agile IT environment without compromising the security of their networks, systems and data? Learn more insights on how these mandates support flexible cybersecurity strategies in “Your Guide to Mission-Driven Cybersecutity”, a guide created by GovLoop and Carahsoft featuring insights from the following technology thought leaders. Continue reading